Expression patterns of nuclear receptors in parenchymal and non-parenchymal mouse liver cells and their modulation in cholestasis.

Nuclear receptors (NR), the largest family of transcription factors, control many physiological and pathological processes. To gain insight into hepatic NR and their potential as therapeutic targets in cholestatis, we determined their expression in individual cell types of the mouse liver in normal and cholestatic conditions. Hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, hepatic stellate cells (HSC), sinusoidal endothelial cells (SEC) and Kupffer cells (KC) were isolated from the liver of mice with acute or chronic cholestasis (i.e. bile duct-ligated or Abcb4-/- mice, respectively) and healthy controls. The expression of 43 out of the 49 NR was evidenced by RT-qPCR in one or several liver cell types. Expression of four NR was restricted to non-parenchymal liver cells. In normal conditions, NR were expressed at higher levels in individual cell types when compared to total liver. Half of the NR expressed in the liver had maximal expression in non-parenchymal cells. After bile duct ligation, NR mRNA changes occurred mostly in non-parenchymal cells and mainly consisted in down-regulations. In Abcb4-/- mice, NR mRNA changes were equally frequent in hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells. Essentially down-regulations were found in hepatocytes, HSC and cholangiocytes, as opposed to up-regulations in SEC and KC. While undetectable in total liver, Vdr expression was up-regulated in all non-parenchymal cells in Abcb4-/- mice. In conclusion, non-parenchymal liver cells are a major site of NR expression. During cholestasis, NR expression is markedly altered mainly by down-regulations, suggesting major changes in metabolic activity. Thus, non-parenchymal cells are important new targets to consider in NR-directed therapies.

Nuclear receptors in acute and chronic cholestasis.

BACKGROUND: Nuclear receptors (NRs) form a family of 48 members. NRs control hepatic processes such as bile acid homeostasis, lipid metabolism and mechanisms involved in fibrosis and inflammation. Due to their central role in the regulation of hepatoprotective mechanisms, NRs are promising therapeutic targets in cholestatic disorders. KEY MESSAGES: NRs can be classified into five different physiological clusters. NRs from the 'bile acids and xenobiotic metabolism' and from the 'lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis' clusters are strongly expressed in the liver. Furthermore, NRs from these clusters, such as farnesoid X receptor α (FXRα), pregnane X receptor (PXR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), have been associated with the pathogenesis and the progression of cholestasis. The latter observation is also true for vitamin D receptor (VDR), which is barely detectable in the whole liver, but has been linked to cholestatic diseases. Involvement of VDR in cholestasis is ascribed to a strong expression in nonparenchymal liver cells, such as biliary epithelial cells, Kupffer cells and hepatic stellate cells. Likewise, NRs from other physiological clusters with low hepatic expression, such as estrogen receptor α (ERα) or reverse-Erb α/ß (REV-ERB α/ß), may also control pathophysiological processes in cholestasis. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we will describe the impact of individual NRs on cholestasis. We will then discuss the potential role of these transcription factors as therapeutic targets.

Phosphorylation of ABCB4 impacts its function: insights from disease-causing mutations.

UNLABELLED: The ABCB4 transporter mediates phosphatidylcholine (PC) secretion at the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes and its genetic defects cause biliary diseases. Whereas ABCB4 shares high sequence identity with the multidrug transporter, ABCB1, its N-terminal domain is poorly conserved, leading us to hypothesize a functional specificity of this domain. A database of ABCB4 genotyping in a large series of patients was screened for variations altering residues of the N-terminal domain. Identified variants were then expressed in cell models to investigate their biological consequences. Two missense variations, T34M and R47G, were identified in patients with low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis or intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. The T34M and R47G mutated proteins showed no or minor defect, respectively, in maturation and targeting to the apical membrane, in polarized Madin-Darby Canine Kidney and HepG2 cells, whereas their stability was similar to that of wild-type (WT) ABCB4. By contrast, the PC secretion activity of both mutants was markedly decreased. In silico analysis indicated that the identified variants were likely to affect ABCB4 phosphorylation. Mass spectrometry analyses confirmed that the N-terminal domain of WT ABCB4 could undergo phosphorylation in vitro and revealed that the T34M and R47G mutations impaired such phosphorylation. ABCB4-mediated PC secretion was also increased by pharmacological activation of protein kinases A or C and decreased by inhibition of these kinases. Furthermore, secretion activity of the T34M and R47G mutants was less responsive than that of WT ABCB4 to protein kinase modulators. CONCLUSION: We identified disease-associated variants of ABCB4 involved in the phosphorylation of its N-terminal domain and leading to decreased PC secretion. Our results also indicate that ABCB4 activity is regulated by phosphorylation, in particular, of N-terminal residues.

Hepatic myofibroblasts promote the progression of human cholangiocarcinoma through activation of epidermal growth factor receptor.

UNLABELLED: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is characterized by an abundant desmoplastic environment. Poor prognosis of CCA has been associated with the presence of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)-positive myofibroblasts (MFs) in the stroma and with the sustained activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in tumor cells. Among EGFR ligands, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) has emerged as a paracrine factor that contributes to intercellular communications between MFs and tumor cells in several cancers. This study was designed to test whether hepatic MFs contributed to CCA progression through EGFR signaling. The interplay between CCA cells and hepatic MFs was examined first in vivo, using subcutaneous xenografts into immunocompromised mice. In these experiments, cotransplantation of CCA cells with human liver myofibroblasts (HLMFs) increased tumor incidence, size, and metastatic dissemination of tumors. These effects were abolished by gefitinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Immunohistochemical analyses of human CCA tissues showed that stromal MFs expressed HB-EGF, whereas EGFR was detected in cancer cells. In vitro, HLMFs produced HB-EGF and their conditioned media induced EGFR activation and promoted disruption of adherens junctions, migratory and invasive properties in CCA cells. These effects were abolished in the presence of gefitinib or HB-EGF-neutralizing antibody. We also showed that CCA cells produced transforming growth factor beta 1, which, in turn, induced HB-EGF expression in HLMFs. CONCLUSION: A reciprocal cross-talk between CCA cells and myofibroblasts through the HB-EGF/EGFR axis contributes to CCA progression.

Vitamin D nuclear receptor deficiency promotes cholestatic liver injury by disruption of biliary epithelial cell junctions in mice.

UNLABELLED: Alterations in apical junctional complexes (AJCs) have been reported in genetic or acquired biliary diseases. The vitamin D nuclear receptor (VDR), predominantly expressed in biliary epithelial cells in the liver, has been shown to regulate AJCs. The aim of our study was thus to investigate the role of VDR in the maintenance of bile duct integrity in mice challenged with biliary-type liver injury. Vdr(-/-) mice subjected to bile duct ligation (BDL) displayed increased liver damage compared to wildtype BDL mice. Adaptation to cholestasis, ascertained by expression of genes involved in bile acid metabolism and tissue repair, was limited in Vdr(-/-) BDL mice. Furthermore, evaluation of Vdr(-/-) BDL mouse liver tissue sections indicated altered E-cadherin staining associated with increased bile duct rupture. Total liver protein analysis revealed that a truncated form of E-cadherin was present in higher amounts in Vdr(-/-) mice subjected to BDL compared to wildtype BDL mice. Truncated E-cadherin was also associated with loss of cell adhesion in biliary epithelial cells silenced for VDR. In these cells, E-cadherin cleavage occurred together with calpain 1 activation and was prevented by the silencing of calpain 1. Furthermore, VDR deficiency led to the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, while EGFR activation by EGF induced both calpain 1 activation and E-cadherin cleavage in these cells. Finally, truncation of E-cadherin was blunted when EGFR signaling was inhibited in VDR-silenced cells. CONCLUSION: Biliary-type liver injury is exacerbated in Vdr(-/-) mice by limited adaptive response and increased bile duct rupture. These results indicate that loss of VDR restricts the adaptation to cholestasis and diminishes bile duct integrity in the setting of biliary-type liver injury.

Role of nuclear receptors in the biliary epithelium.

The biliary epithelium is organized as a single layer of biliary epithelial cells lining the biliary tree. Biliary epithelial cells have three major biological functions: protection, secretion and proliferation. These functions are all controlled by nuclear receptors. The biliary tree conveys bile, a complex fluid containing toxics such as endotoxins, from the liver to the duodenum. Active protection against endotoxins can be elicited by the vitamin D receptor or the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), thus avoiding constant inflammation of the biliary epithelium. Anti-inflammatory activities may be triggered by PPAR-α and -γ, which are also able to inhibit the deleterious effect of bacterial products. Secretion, a major function of biliary epithelial cells, is mainly regulated by circulating factors. Luminal factors, such as bile salts, may also control fluid secretion by classical intracellular pathways, membrane receptors or nuclear receptors. FXR or the glucocorticoid receptor have indeed been shown to increase the expression of genes encoding membrane-bound proteins that participate in biliary epithelial cell secretion. Biliary epithelial cells are quiescent cells that are able to proliferate in pathophysiological settings. Inhibition of estrogen receptor signaling decreases pathological biliary epithelial cell proliferation. Furthermore, progesterone, through the progesterone receptor, increases biliary epithelial cells proliferation. Taken together these observations suggest that nuclear receptors are involved in the control of biliary epithelial cell biology. A better delineation of the specific biliary epithelial cell functions controlled by nuclear receptors may shed light on potential therapeutic molecular targets of cholangiopathies.

Vitamin D and the vitamin D receptor in liver pathophysiology.

Vitamin D through the vitamin D nuclear receptor (VDR) plays a key role in mineral ion homeostasis. The liver is central in vitamin D synthesis, however the direct involvement of the vitamin D-VDR axis on the liver remains to be evaluated. In this review, we will describe vitamin D metabolism and the mechanisms of homeostatic control. We will also address the associations between the vitamin D-VDR axis and pathological liver entities, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, autoimmune liver disease, viral hepatitis and liver cancer. The link between liver diseases and the vitamin D-VDR axis will be discussed in light of evidences arising from in vitro and in vivo studies. Finally, we will consider the therapeutic potential of the vitamin D-VDR axis in liver diseases.

Bile salts control the antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin through nuclear receptors in the human biliary epithelium.

BACKGROUNDS & AIMS: Under normal conditions, the biliary tract is a microbial-free environment. The absence of microorganisms has been attributed to various defense mechanisms that include the physicochemical and signaling actions of bile salts. Here, we hypothesized that bile salts may stimulate the expression of a major antimicrobial peptide, cathelicidin, through nuclear receptors in the biliary epithelium. METHODS: The expression of cathelicidin was analyzed in human liver samples by immunostaining and reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The regulation of cathelicidin expression by the endogenous bile salt, chenodeoxycholic acid, and by the therapeutic bile salt, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), was assessed in human biliary epithelial cells in which endogenous nuclear receptor expression was blunted by siRNA or dominant-negative strategies. RESULTS: In the human liver, biliary epithelial cells show intense immunoreactivity for cathelicidin and for the vitamin D receptor. In cultured biliary epithelial cells, chenodeoxycholic acid and UDCA induce cathelicidin expression through 2 different nuclear receptors: the farnesoid X receptor and the vitamin D receptor, respectively. Importantly, vitamin D further increases the induction of cathelicidin expression by both bile salts. In a prototypical inflammatory biliary disease (ie, primary biliary cirrhosis), we document that hepatic expressions of the vitamin D receptor and of cathelicidin significantly increased with UDCA therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that bile salts may contribute to biliary tract sterility by controlling epithelial cell innate immunity. They further suggest that in inflammatory biliary diseases, which involve bacterial factors, a strategy systematically combining UDCA with vitamin D would increase therapeutic efficacy.